A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has progressed right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their see, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular efforts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations, a picture that has considering that develop into emblematic from the intensity with the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they ended up meant to Acquire visual evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Males entered the h2o throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the location became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these actions were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Irish Times article about René Collier Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined intimately via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as readers sought to understand the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read more submissions on whether or not interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
For the core on the dispute is often a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his examination of organizing documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've described their extensive-standing link to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just trying to make a family property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court have to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.